Only sectarian factionalism can save us now!
by J.A. Myerson
Most Occupiers I’ve asked (and it’s not just one or two) agree that the 99% Spring is at best cool and at worst harmless, but you would never know it from the hue and cry clogging up my inbox.
Two examples:
AdBusters issued another exhilarating ”Tactical Briefing” (what an exquisitely self-congratulatory name) from “Culture Jammers HQ” (see previous parenthetical observation), issuing strict marching orders to take up the “battle” for the “soul” of OWS against the “cabal” not of Wall Street, K Street and the Pentagon but MoveOn, The Nation and Ben & Jerry’s. These are the forces of the “old left” which are out to destroy the “new, vibrant, horizontal left.” How a commitment to horizontalism squares with instructions handed down from “HQ” goes unexplained. We have to fight the “old left,” says AdBusters, or risk going the way of “Paris ’68.” The more skillful Wikipedia-users out there may discover that it was not the progressive French left that destroyed the workers’ and students’ commune, but General De Gaulle’s tanks. One level deeper, people will point out that the French Communist Party and liberal trade unions shepherded participants back to work. To them I say: MoveOn, The Nation and Ben & Jerry’s have not discouraged anyone from Occupying. To the contrary. Look: The Nation was founded by abolitionists and has published the work of, among many others, Bertrand Russell, Edward Said, James Baldwin, Naomi Klein and Mai68 supporter Jean-Paul Sartre. Hell, their OWS beat reporter is Allison Kilkenny, who is about as radical as any successful journalist in the United States. If that’s the dark side, sign me up. If Kalle Lasn and Micah White’s frenzied ravings (“Whatever you do, don’t allow our revolutionary struggle…”) are the new left, count me out.
CounterPunch valiantly calls our attention to the true villains: AlterNet, Truth Out, The Nation (again!) and the television shows of Bill Moyers, Thom Hartmann and Chris Hayes (Disclosure: I have appeared on or in all but Moyers’ show). Never mind that CP is the outfit of Alexander Cockburn, a longtime columnist at The Nation (where he heroically dismisses the evidence of climate crisis on a regular basis). Forget the fact that Hayes’ show has done the most in-depth investigation of a whole slew of third rail topics (e.g. atheism, Palestine, the racist criminal justice system, and American imperialism, which he discussed, by name, with four Arab guests) probably in the history of American television. The 99% Spring, we are told, is “merely a front group” for the Democratic Party, though it remains unclear how the 7-hour milquetoast direct action training is supposed to coerce participants into campaigning for President Obama. The article is so breathless in its rapid-fire associations (Bank of America! ALEC! President Obama! Mother Jones!) that it proclaims the whole affair “A Shakespearean tragedy, to say the least.” Well, in Titus Andronicus, Lavinia, who has been raped and her hands and tongue severed, picks up the freshly severed hand of her father in her still-bleeding mouth. In the 99% Spring, people watch a clip from a movie and meet other activists. Parity?
How does this make more sense than pounding away at the corporate state? Why isn’t the battle with bankers, polluters and warmongers but instead the United States’ finest publications and broadcasts? A revolution is a massive social consensus that sweeps aside the institutions of power. Mubarak only fell after more than 10% of the Egyptian population took to the streets, and that wasn’t even enough to get rid of the Egyptian social order. For something like that, you need an absolutely overwhelming show of people power. Deliberately alienating supporters is exactly the wrong way of going about generating such a thing — how is this not obvious? Without recruiting liberals and progressives, attempting to radicalize them and train them in the skills necessary for successful protest, Occupy Wall Street becomes what the corporate media want us to be: a bunch of hippies and anarchists, whining and drumming, talking to one another self-righteously, without analysis or tactical sophistication.
As someone who has been madly in love with Occupy Wall Street since its earliest moments, I decline CounterPunch and AdBusters’ offer of protection from the “old left.” Right now is the time to build the movement, to engineer solidarity, to teach and share and radicalize and do what is done at general assemblies everywhere: enlist democratic support for a series of proposals. No working group has ever gotten a GA to consent to a measure by vilifying and fear-mongering about other working groups.
We have a really big job ahead of us, confronting global neo-liberal corporate capital and the disastrous effects it has wrought on everything in its path. Can we please get serious about organizing our defense?
Until the Occupy movement moves on FoxNews I and FoxNews II aka FoxBusiness…it cannot have any impact on the financial and political
Right in this nation. FoxNews is Joseph Goebbels wet dream and Roger
Ailes of FoxNews is what Goebbels could only dream of. This machine
is pumping propaganda 24 hours a day. Ju
Divide and conquer is the only way for them to win. Ego is the first thing to cast aside. There are only two sides. “Who’s side are you on boys, who’s side are you on?”The Occupy movement would do well to follow MLK and be non violent, respectfull, and she’d the anarchist. There are always going to be infiltrators within these” liberal” organizations that prompt radicalism to destroy the movement. People need to be focused. The enemy is the lobbyist, the banks and the money infused into our democracy.
JA – please write a post about your all-important question – “How is this not obvious?”
Don’t sweat this. They aren’t wrong on being suspicious of the “old-Left” machinery. The old left/right PR machines and the current financial system are very similar constructs – a middle man that somehow found itself in the position of gatekeeper over industry, creativity, and innovation, then used that position to serve its own short term interest of keeping and maintaining that control. Seeing that failing machinery operate within the new comes off as vulgar to some, and they’re going to point it out as we continue on. Learn to let it go and keep moving.
In broad strokes, I very much agree with this. At the same time, I’m a little more understanding about the fear of being co-opted into partisan politics…. I admire Chris Hayes, and I think as much as is possible, he’s been a creature of the Washington/NY elite political media without being corrupted. But he is a creature of that elite, I think, and it’s something of a miracle that he’s maintained his integrity in that environment. I don’t like the tribalist bullshit you’re critiquing it, but I understand sensitivity to insider capture.
I respect this piece quite a bit, and I think the Counterpunch article singling out of good, alt-media sources like MJ, Truthout, Alternet and others is undeserved and ultimately counter-productive (although The Nation’s printing of Ilyse Hogue and Van Jones most recent pieces in support of 99% Spring were pretty meh, quite frankly).
But like many things, we are focusing on the wrong problem. Whether or not 99% Spring is a good way to grow the movement or is naked co-optation is really not the issue. Effectiveness is the issue. And from personal experience, it wasn’t. Something should not be billed as a training in NVCD if it is only an infotainment pop-history lecture. Perhaps at other trainings across the country there were practical tactical demonstrations and workshops, but the meeting I went to was nothing of the sort. If pe
It pains me to say this all, as people I respect and like from a nearby Occupation helped to run the meeting I attended. It was obvious however, that very little of their spirit, humor and expertise went into the overall presentation. It was top-down, and appealed to sentiment rather than true analysis. “How did we get here? Bankers are bad, that’s how. Moving on, Rosa Parks was…” Shouldn’t we be past that point already? A perversion of capitalism isn’t the problem, the purest expression of capitalism is the problem. And that was not on display and probably will never be, considering the viewpoint of the too-big to succeed mishmash of sponsoring non-profits behind 99% Spring. Please remember they have just as much to lose in a true revolution as the mega-banks do.
I’d like to know what to do in a small town with low numbers of people involved. What I care about is reversing the cultural temdency to be greedy, blame others and remain ignorant of the screwing the 99% is getting from the 1%
It isn’t “the old left” that threatens, but the *faux left* misnamed “Democratic Party” behind the 99%Spring. Cooptation doesn’t come from sects, it comes from the corporate sector, the familiar gravity that threatens any departure from business as usual, pulling revolt back into the black hole of the status quo. With that said, let people by all means go to the 99%Spring events, and see what results. It is possible to do good actions in common with folks who are tied to the fake-left party of war and Wall Street; heck, I’ve been on a couple myself. The point is to be aware of how it’s done, who’s calling the shots, and the inevitable draw towards our Nobel drone in the White House, along with other pretendgressives labeled ‘D’. Unite where we can, but without illusions. When it comes time to vote for more civil-liberties repression, Goldman Sachs in the Cabinet, endless war, concealment, spying, and intrusion by government, that’s the time to stand aside and march separately.
John jones said it…….divide and conquer!! That’s ALL this is about. Two sides, which one do you represent?